Another case study post today, all about the problems of long-distance limerence, or perhaps, in fact, the problems of long-distance uncertainty.
Here’s the dilemma from reader Laura:
LO and I were in a relationship for two years, although on and off. There were some problems, but we were aware of this and communicated openly and were vulnerable about it.
Unfortunately, he had to return to his home country and that’s when he became an LO for me. It was horrible, impossible to escape. We pushed and pulled each other for a year and a half. Wanted to break up because things were in general not working out, but we just repeatedly couldn’t. So we added a bunch of uncertainty on top of it all ourselves.
After wrestling with this limbo state for a while, Laura came to realise that the long distance limerence was not going to resolve itself. Eventually, they admitted defeat.
We are now separated but the physical distance still plays a part in my LE. He has another girlfriend now, but even this is not enough for me to feel there is no chance. Secretly I still feel that what we had was special and that if the distance wasn’t there all would be different.
So, despite the best attempts to make it work, and despite recognising that they were fighting a slow defeat, Laura’s limerence has not gone away. Even though she is clear in her mind that she wants to “recover and grow for herself”.
I don’t think that Laura is looking for advice about the relationship, and she wisely doesn’t want to get caught up in psychoanalysing the behaviour of her LO. Instead:
I would love to read about how doing long distance, without a clear finish line, can add to the limerence.
That last comment about “no clear finish line” is probably the heart of this story. The thread throughout all of Laura’s experience is uncertainty. I’ve written before about how it may be the limerent’s Achilles’ heel, and long-distance limerence is an ideal scenario for triggering it. Almost every aspect of the situation will exacerbate limerence. It’s like a terrible perfect storm.

Let’s work through some of the worst ways that distance can amplify limerence.
1. The relationship was already uncertain
From Laura’s account, it seems that the relationship with LO was already somewhat uncertain, even before separation triggered a worsening of her limerence pain.
This uncertainty could have been the usual ups and down of different expectations around what love should feel like, or clashes of attachment style or any of the many other possible incompatibilities that make the path of love rocky.
Alternatively, the problems may have been more serious, and the relationship might not have ended up being viable in the long-term. As I put it before, sometimes love takes work, but it shouldn’t be a labour of Hercules. Sometimes it is wise to give up.
The crucial factor in Laura’s case, though, is that she didn’t get to find out naturally. There was no opportunity to properly resolve any issues they were facing as a couple, before he had to move away.
They didn’t get to choose.
They didn’t get a chance to give it their best shot.
2. The distance was an enforced barrier
That reality meant that the distance between them wasn’t a decision that they’d made, it was a barrier enforced by circumstances.
The consequence is that the uncertainty already existing in the relationship got set into place, like it was pickled in aspic.

Having important life choices taken out of our hands is always distressing and demoralising. It makes you feel like you are not in charge of your fate, that forces are working against you, and that you are being robbed of opportunities you might have wanted to seize.
That’s a psychologically potent mix of emotions – anger, anxiety, fear, loss, insecurity, injustice – which stir up the subconscious and won’t give you peace. Depending on your personality, this could provoke different responses – from despair at the unfairness, to bloody-minded determination to fight back.
Or you might oscillate back and forth between these options, not knowing what you really want to do.
3. Purposeful action is difficult
Uncertainty that is outside of your control is hard to respond to purposefully. In Laura’s case, there are some grand actions that could theoretically be undertaken to try and resolve the situation, but they are high stakes and certainly impractical – her moving to his country, him applying for leave to return to hers, them getting married to tie their fates together.
To make a change as decisive as that you’ve got to both be sure that you really want the outcome.
In reality, they just wanted to see if things would work out long-term. They weren’t at the “our love will not be denied” stage of bonding, and busily planning the future together. It’s very hard at that point to make intelligent, purposeful choices about whether you should fight against the enforced separation and keep hope alive, or accept that this is the end of something that just didn’t work out.
But that indecision becomes another source of frustration and irritation. Your subconscious turmoil is not going to be calmed by inaction. You want to do something.
“Fatalistically let everything slowly unravel” is hardly an inspiring rallying cry.
4. A loose end in your life story
The subconscious mind – that part where limerence lives – thinks in stories. Stories have narrative momentum. They demand resolution, and hate loose ends. Love affairs are not supposed to just peter out.
This sense of unfinished business will nag at the subconscious. The inability to get closure is an irritant – especially when external circumstances caused the problem.
It’s like you don’t know how the story was supposed to end, because someone ripped out the last few pages of a book. Now, you have to try and imagine what it would have been.
Another factor here is how your past has shaped your own perception of your life narrative. If anxious attachment wounds lie in your past, this episode might become another painful abandonment story. If previous betrayals still haunt you, then LO getting a new girlfriend might damage your pride and trigger old insecurities.
The fact that you didn’t get to resolve the story yourself will set off your subconscious on an attempt to make sense of the narrative, based on your previous patterns and beliefs.
What to do?
Laura has actually already figured out what she wants to do. Intellectually, she can see that the relationship didn’t survive the separation, that LO is looking to move on, and that she wants the same for herself.
Unfortunately, limerence doesn’t listen to reason.

The challenge – as always with limerence – is getting your emotions to go along with your intellect.
I think there are two big steps that can help.
First, accept that closure is an illusion. Perfect endings don’t exist, and life is never a neat calculation of pluses and minuses. That frees you to find closure in making decisions by yourself. You have decided that this period of your romantic life is coming to an end and are going to take the necessary steps to make yourself well again.
The second step is to compose a new story to finally quiet the psychic itch of those loose ends. Laura gets to be the author of her own destiny, but if it were me, my rewriting would probably be something along the lines of:
This was the relationship that taught me about limerence, about the pain of uncertainty, and about my personal vulnerabilities. It was an important episode in my life, but the episode is over now. He and I are moving on, wiser, and toughened a little by fate. I’m glad I got to learn those lessons.
Placate your subconscious that the story does make sense, it isn’t unfinished – it just took a twist in the plot that you weren’t expecting at first. There is a logic to the narrative, and the experiences that you had.
And, most importantly of all, the journey is still ongoing, with many adventures ahead…
While for me long distance worked well to let limerence peter out, there might, for other people, be other factors that keep limerence alive when LO is far away.
For example, limerence can be a sort of escapism, something to distract your mind from unpleasant or stressful stuff in daily life, and what better than a distant LO who isn’t touched by daily unpleasantness or reality checks. Nothing to disturb the vision of someone perfect out there, you can safely wallow in daydreams since you don’t have to interact with LO and get rejected or see not so pleasant character traits.
This!
So, if Laura intellectually knows the relationship is over, is she prepared to begin the grieving process? She didn’t get the outcome that she potentially wanted and didn’t get the chance to find out if it could. Grief is hard on anybody but it might be worse for limerents (e.g., disenfranchised grief.) I think I only have one “failed” relationship. My definition of failure is I wasn’t able to achieve the outcome I was hoping for no matter what I said or did.
My friend the LCSW told me that one reason I was having such a hard time getting past LO #2 was I never grieved for the relationship. Once I did, things started to get better. If Laura is truly attached to her LO, the end of the relationship is a loss. Depending on Laura’s unique make up, it could be relatively benign or very traumatic but it’s still a loss.
The end of the 5 Stages of Grief is acceptance. But, what does that mean? Acceptance is different for everybody. Personally, it came down to indifference anchored in the realization that not everyone who comes into your life is meant to stay there. Once I got to the point where I accepted that not everyone who comes into your life was meant to stay there, I was able to see things from different perspectives.
I realized that “LO” is a label, not a position and I have no place for an LO or xLO in my life. I was able to look back on things and see that there were good things about the LEs, the last one happening when I was married not withstanding. I think I will always consider LO #2 the “villain” in our relationship in that she declined every offer I made her and appeared to want to keep me in reserve. The therapist described LO #2 as “manipulative, passive-aggressive, and triangulating.” However, LO #2 showed me that happiness was a possibility for me and contributed to two of the best years of my life. She also was the central figure in two of the worst years and the trendline was in the wrong direction. But, that’s me.
Again, acceptance will mean different things to different people and how they get to it will depend on their unique factors. Some people may spend a lot of time in Anger, some may spend a lot of time in Bargaining. The process isn’t linear and you can go back and forth between stages. There may be things in someone’s circumstances that make it hard to get out of a stage and it may take some work, possibly with a pro, to figure that out. If Laura really wants to get past this, she’ll have to define what acceptance will mean to her.
Then, she’ll have to get there.
It’s hard to see the forest when you’re dodging trees. My personal analogy is being able to gain altitude and get above the trees to where I’m no longer in the forest.
Laura has a lot to consider.
https://livingwithlimerence.com/on-grief/
https://livingwithlimerence.com/the-loneliness-of-no-contact/
Long-distance this week ? I’m on it !
Laura says :
“I would love to read about how doing long distance, without a clear finish line, can add to the limerence.”
A few of my thoughts as to the why :
1) I am not sure if Laura was able to meet her LO to mutually agree to end the relationship. I am going to assume not.
Generally, I think relationships that break-up over the phone are more painful and difficult to get closure on, and leaves a lot of loose ends.
A relationship that was special deserves and warrants the face to face talk and appreciation of what you had together, which helps to move on to the grief stage.
The long distance further exacerbates that feeling of ‘being cheated’ out of having a sweet goodbye and final embrace. Every mile of distance between you dials up that feeling of unfairness.
Maybe this is contributing to not being able to let go.
2) The pain of the high likelihood of never seeing each other again, may be simply too much to contemplate, so Laura hangs on to the sweet limerent thoughts of LO to comfort her from facing that reality.
Most people actually date locally, so there is always the chance you may bump into a previous partner at a restaurant etc or if each others circumstances change, it is potentially much easier to reconnect when you are more local and have friend connections.
3) Also if Laura may be stuck in LE, due to the thoughts of a potentially different life if she moved to that other country, maybe it has a very different lifestyle, climate and culture. It is very exciting and enticing to think of moving somewhere different and far away and starting fresh.
Many people fantasize about moving somewhere exotic with a wonderful new life.
We may regret not doing that and for Laura maybe more so, as it was more tangible and could have been possible. This could be a factor in the LE too.
The reality of such a move may be not so easy or exciting, because we still have to do laundry wherever we live.
4) And definitely what Mila wrote above ! This one for me too.
as Dr.L says, Laura has the opportunity to write her own story and future.
Best wishes Laura if you are reading.
Yeah, distance is no match for some limerents. It may actually intensify LE’s, because there is simply so much glorious, detached, room to daydream…not to mention it makes any kind of dishonesty or misrepresentation (to either self, or to LO) soooo much easier.
“No clear finish line” does not have to be true. We accept it as true, because the idea of cutting the cord, of saying “Nope! No mas!” to our fantasy, it’s…unthinkable. Too painful. Can’t live without this person in my life. Non-starter.
We want to avoid that pain – of losing our fantasy, our light, our “special connection” with another — and it’s easier if we just keep it going, even if we are withering away. Long distance makes it pretty easy to ignore what we probably need to do…Thank LO for being so special, for their time/friendship/care/lessons/special qualities/whatever, then get out those scissors, and cut the cord. SNIP.
For a local LO, distance, for me, is usually a helpful thing – I usually do better if I “pull a geographical” to use the Alcoholics Anonymous phrase…
But, I have also been in limerences that were long distance, for instance, they began that way, and after a meeting or several, ended that way, and I will say, and a multiple offender, who is basically a self-annointed limerence sommalier at this point, haha, LD LE’s have a totally different bouquet than the local variety.